BMW has quietly drawn a strategic line in the fast-evolving battle over electric-vehicle batteries. With the commissioning of its new battery cell recycling facility in Bavaria, operated with circular-economy specialist Encory, the German carmaker is not only closing the loop on its electric drivetrains but also making a clear statement about which battery chemistry it believes will remain central to the premium EV market.
While much of the global industry is moving toward lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cells, BMW is doubling down on nickel-rich NMC batteries — and designing its recycling strategy accordingly.
Direct recycling
The newly operational plant marks a shift from conventional battery recycling. Instead of relying primarily on energy-intensive thermal or chemical treatments, BMW’s so-called “direct recycling” process mechanically dismantles battery cells and production scrap.
It recovers cathode materials that can be fed straight back into battery cell manufacturing. By avoiding full chemical breakdown, the company aims to reduce carbon emissions, lower costs, and retain tighter control over critical raw materials such as nickel, cobalt, and lithium.

The facility is initially focused on production scrap and pre-series cells, but it is designed to scale as BMW’s electric-vehicle volumes grow.
Emphasis on NMC
The emphasis on NMC chemistry is deliberate. Today, most of BMW’s electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles rely on nickel-manganese-cobalt cells, which offer higher energy density and stronger performance than LFP alternatives.
For a manufacturer whose brand identity is built around range, power, and driving dynamics, the additional weight and volume associated with LFP batteries remain a constraint.
Recycling NMC cells also makes stronger economic sense: nickel and cobalt are valuable, supply-constrained materials, and recovering them efficiently reduces exposure to volatile global markets and geopolitically sensitive supply chains.
LFP gaining ground
This strategy sets BMW apart at a time when LFP is gaining ground worldwide. In China, which dominates both EV sales and battery production, LFP already accounts for a majority of electric cars sold, driven by lower costs, longer cycle life, and improved safety.
Western manufacturers have begun to follow, particularly for entry-level vehicles and fleets, where affordability outweighs peak performance. Tesla, Volkswagen, and several European mass-market brands now pursue dual-chemistry strategies, pairing LFP for standard-range models with nickel-based cells for higher trims.
Contrast with Umicore
The contrast with Belgian materials group Umicore is instructive. Once seen as Europe’s flagship bet on battery circularity, Umicore invested heavily in nickel-rich NMC cathode production and recycling capacity.
However, it is to see the market turn as LFP adoption accelerates, nickel and cobalt prices fall, and Europe’s EV rollout slows. This sequence led investors to frame Umicore’s strategy as a wrong bet on chemistry.
In reality, the challenge lay less with NMC itself than with timing and exposure. Umicore’s model depended on high commodity prices and a rapidly expanding open market for recycled materials.
In contrast, BMW’s approach is inward-looking and defensive, aimed at stabilising supply, meeting regulations, and lowering lifecycle costs regardless of short-term metal price swings.
Lessons learned
BMW’s recycling plant thus reflects a lesson learned: nickel-rich batteries still hold strategic value, but recycling them only pays off when tightly integrated into an automaker’s own production system rather than treated as a standalone commodity business.
A look at how major carmakers actually deploy battery chemistries underlines how differentiated the market has become. Tesla, often cited as a bellwether, uses LFP cells for its standard-range models while reserving nickel-based NCA or NMC batteries for long-range and performance variants.
Volkswagen follows a similar approach with its MEB platform, pairing LFP with entry-level vehicles and higher-nickel chemistries with higher-trim vehicles. By contrast, Renault and Stellantis have pushed more decisively toward LFP as a cost-driven solution for mass-market electrification.
BMW and Mercedes-Benz sit at opposite ends of the spectrum: both continue to rely primarily on NMC today, treating LFP as a potential option rather than a default choice.
The pattern suggests that battery chemistry decisions are more about positioning than ideology, with premium manufacturers prioritising performance and energy density, while volume players optimise for cost and scale.
Vertical integration
BMW’s approach stands out for its vertical integration and technological ambition, linking recycling directly to future cell production rather than treating it as an end-of-life obligation.
As EU battery regulations tighten and recycled-content requirements become mandatory, the ability to reclaim and reuse high-value materials will increasingly shape competitiveness.
BMW’s move suggests that, despite the industry’s growing enthusiasm for LFP, nickel-rich batteries are far from obsolete — at least in the premium segment. Rather than betting on a single dominant chemistry, BMW is positioning itself for a multi-chemistry future in which performance, circularity, and control over raw materials matter as much as cost.
In that sense, BMW’s recycling facility is more than an environmental milestone. It is a signal that, in Europe’s electric-vehicle transition, not all battery strategies — or business models — will succeed equally.


