Antwerp and Ostend airports almost back at pre-corona level

Last summer, the airports of Antwerp and Ostend-Bruges welcomed almost 50% more passengers than last year. After two years of travel restrictions, the airports welcomed almost 160 000 passengers during the summer holidays. This means that these Flemish regional airports, managed by the French engineering group Egis, currently have 80% of the number of passengers they had before corona in 2019.

However, a cost-benefit analysis published in July on these loss-making regional airports supported by the Flemish community shows that it would be better to close them.

Fewer destinations

Ostend Airport received 94 085 passengers in July and August. That is an increase of 34% compared to 2021. This summer, the airport welcomed 73% of the number of passengers again during the summer of 2019.

However, comparing the figures with 2019 is difficult because 22 destinations were flown. This summer Ostend Airport had only 13 destinations on offer. The most popular destinations were Alicante, the Canary Islands, and Malaga.

More business flights

Over 64 500 passengers departed from Antwerp Airport in July and August. That is an increase of 72% compared to last year and over 97% of the number of passengers who chose the airport for summer 2019.

In total, 191 000 passengers traveled via Antwerp Airport this year. That is 96% of the number of passengers the airport could welcome in the same period in 2019. The top destinations for Antwerp airport last summer were Alicante, Malaga, and Ibiza.

Business and private flights also did well in Antwerp. This year, the number of business flights increased more than 16% compared with the same period in 2019. In addition, the number of business flights via Antwerp Airport was 29% higher in July and August than in the summer of 2019.

Protest in Antwerp

Between 19 September and 25 October, the airport will be temporarily closed. “Then the runway will be provided with a new top layer,” says CEO Eric Dumas, who manages the airport of Antwerp and Ostend-Bruges. “These works are essential to be able to welcome hundreds of thousands of holidaymakers in the years to come,” Dumas says.

Local residents are also protesting against the works at the Deurne-located Antwerp Airport. The group Vliegerplein opposes the planned renovation works costing some 25 million euros. Besides Vliegerplein, the municipality of Borsbeek and Bond Beter Leefmilieu also filed a similar complaint.

According to Vliegerplein, the investments at Antwerp Airport are illegal because they involve an extension of the runway, only just over 1 500 meters. However, the airport itself denies this, citing the so-called exemption decision. That decision states that no environmental permit is needed if the runway is not touched.

And the Ostend-Bruges Airport wants to focus more on cargo transport in the future, hence the construction of Cargo Village. However, there are fears among residents that this will turn the airport into a (night) cargo airport “à la Liège-Bierset”. Here too, a non-profit organization went to the Council for Permit Disputes.


A long-awaited cost-benefit analysis of the three Flemish regional airports, namely Antwerp (Deurne), Ostend-Bruges, and Kortrijk (Wevelgem), was also published in mid-July. The study shows that making these Flemish regional airports profitable is almost impossible. For Antwerp and Kortrijk closure is the most efficient. However, without massive government support for security and firefighting, the operation of these airports is not profitable.

Currently, the subsidies for Ostend-Bruges amount to 120 million euros annually, for Antwerp 79 million euros, and for Kortrijk 29 million euros.

The analysis, which was made at the request of the Flemish government, comes to two conclusions. First, the airports can only run without losses when they expand to the maximum, with passenger numbers far above what they have ever achieved. It is highly uncertain whether these scenarios can be realized, the study states.

Secondly, for Antwerp and Kortrijk, closures are the scenarios with the highest social return. Closing Deurne, Brussels Airport is at approximately 40 km, would generate 40 million euros, eight times more than the second-best scenario. In Ostend, closure is the most advantageous option.

Important role

Employers’ organization Voka Antwerp-Waasland does not agree with this. According to Voka, a study carried out by Econopolis clearly shows that the airport in Deurne, through new technological developments, can grow into a pearl. “A good example are the electric aircraft that Antwerp Flying Group is already investing in,” says Luc Luwel, managing director of Voka.

The regional airports also emphasize their increasingly important role. “Our airports are not crowded, we are always easily accessible, and there is a family atmosphere at our airports. Now that many airports are struggling with staff and capacity shortages, the regional airports can play an important role.”


Ready to join the conversation?

You must be an active subscriber to leave a comment.

Subscribe Today

You Might Also Like

%d bloggers like this: